On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Kostya <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:55:17AM +0100, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >> Nothing requires this value in %eax. > > > > IIUC, return value is put into eax, thus making asm output result directly > > into that register, thus preventing GCC from pessimising the code. > > The function is often inlined where there is no return value as such. > In the non-inline case, gcc does use eax for that value on its own.
Not that I care much, but I'd like to hear from x86 experts, otherwise it looks fine with me. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
