Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 01:27:17PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: >> > + * Really, the only reason this type of scaling (fast bilinear) exists >> > + * is because it allowed for certain types of MMX/MMX2 optimizations. >> > + * In most practical cases, there is no reason to use this type of >> > + * scaling. >> >> I think we should remove this part, it's not very positive and doesn't >> add anything... > > What about keeping just the second sentence: > > * In most practical cases, there is no reason to use this type of > * scaling.
I consider it patronizing to tell a user what to do or what not to do... Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
