On date Wednesday 2011-06-29 14:46:34 -0700, Ronald S. Bultje encoded: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:13:16PM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: [...] > >> --- a/ffmpeg.c > >> +++ b/ffmpeg.c > >> @@ -1206,6 +1213,11 @@ static void do_video_out(AVFormatContext *s, > >> } > >> sws_scale(ost->img_resample_ctx, formatted_picture->data, > >> formatted_picture->linesize, > >> 0, ost->resample_height, final_picture->data, > >> final_picture->linesize); > >> +#else > >> + av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_ERROR, > >> + "Image resampling needed, please compile with swscale\n"); > >> + exit(1); > >> +#endif > > > > Hmmm, well, that's why we require swscale for ffmpeg - what is the > > grand plan here? Does ffmpeg actually get used without swscale? > > As said, it's not ultra-functional but still does some things.
+1, think of embedded systems with very limited memory resources and very specific uses, 100KB of memory footprint less can save you the day. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
