"Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Mans Rullgard <m...@mansr.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <m...@mansr.com>
>> ---
>> libswscale/ppc/swscale_altivec.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libswscale/ppc/swscale_altivec.c
>> b/libswscale/ppc/swscale_altivec.c
>> index 369e93b..501a4f7 100644
>> --- a/libswscale/ppc/swscale_altivec.c
>> +++ b/libswscale/ppc/swscale_altivec.c
>> @@ -409,7 +409,8 @@ void ff_sws_init_swScale_altivec(SwsContext *c)
>> if (c->scalingBpp == 8) {
>> c->hScale = hScale_altivec_real;
>> }
>> - if (!is16BPS(dstFormat) && !is9_OR_10BPS(dstFormat) &&
>> + if (!is16BPS(c->srcFormat) && !is9_OR_10BPS(c->srcFormat) &&
>> + !is16BPS(dstFormat) && !is9_OR_10BPS(dstFormat) &&
>
> Why?
>
> yuv2yuvX is output vertical scaling, if input is >8bit, 19to15Fw
> scales it back to a range that yuv2yuvX understands. (Jason thinks
> this is non-optimal, so I'll look into changing this, but currently, I
> don't think this patch is necessary.)
The 10-bit dnxhd tests fail without it. How should that be fixed instead?
--
Måns Rullgård
m...@mansr.com
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
