Clément Bœsch <ubi...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 03:29:10AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:45:09PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:06:41PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> > [...] >> > > >> > > I still don't like it. >> > >> > OK you won, I give up. I really don't feel welcome here anyway, so I won't >> > send anything ever again. Sorry to have been such a burden. >> >> What do you expect? > > I did expect more than just "This is stupid", "This doesn't look right", > or "I don't like it", like for example, why is it wrong. I would have > prefer a "patch refused" from the beginning, but instead I just wasted my > time and yours.
That was my first reply, more or less. You still persisted, for which you have only yourself to blame. >> The latest version of your patch adds 'grep -v' hacks in places for a >> feature that only you use so far > > You're rude. I added just one grep -v "hack". Every big mess started out as just one little hack. > I'm also not aware of any better solution, neither I heard anything > about that before this mail. Can you propose any better working > solution? Several have been suggested. > And of course I'm the only one to use it since the feature currently > doesn't exist. That doesn't mean no one will ever want it. Your use case is simply not a priority. Suck it up. >> and can already be achieved through other means. That's kind of hard to >> justify... > > Yes, with --disable-ffmpeg --disable-avconv --disable-avserver > --disable-avplay --disable-avprobe. You can also disable all demuxers one > by one, but instead you have --disable-demuxers; this is the same problem. Firstly, there are hundreds of demuxers and only a handful of programs. Secondly, building the programs takes very little time, and they can be easily deleted if not wanted. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
