Hi, On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Kieran Kunhya <[email protected]> wrote: > Since in a lot of cases FATE is forced to appear green with non-bitexact > samples, at the moment there is no definitive list of which samples are > bitexact and which aren't. > This means that only a couple of people know what is actually broken and what > is actually bitexact. > > I have started to make a list (thanks to Ronald for providing the h264 > information) to list the actual breakages: > http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=FATE_failures > > > I would propose that anyone who forces FATE to appear green whilst the codec > is not bit-exact must add the information to the list.
I'm all in favour of this. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
