On 11/4/11 3:46 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2011, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 11/4/11 11:16 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Luca Barbato<[email protected]> writes:
On 11/4/11 9:45 AM, Kostya Shishkov wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 04:42:11PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Luca Barbato<[email protected]> writes:
On 11/4/11 9:28 AM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Write it in a non-ugly way of course.
Let me expand:
- the strcasecmp/strncasecmp itself isn't much different than the
usual libc implementation, the toupper can enjoy a better
implementation (to be noted that in all libc I had a look into
strcase
uses tolower).
Yes, that macro is what I was talking about.
What about
#define TOUPPER(c) \
if (c>= 'a'&& c<= 'z') \
c ^= 0x20;
Looks nicer.
I'd make it a bit more function-like or even an inline function.
Do we have other uses for it (seems we are using toupper somewhere as
well?
Yes, I think it might be useful in most (all?) other places, too.
If it's kept as a static inline function, I don't like av_ as prefix for
it, since it tells me that it is an external function. Not sure what
would be better though (and something is necessary), since ff_ has a
certain meaning, too. ascii_toupper() perhaps? OTOH, if it's made a
public function, av_ is the right prefix of course.
I guess we could stick it in the public header as static inline and be
done with that.
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
