On 11/24/2011 03:34 AM, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 24/11/11 00:49, Justin Ruggles wrote: >> ist->next_pts += ((int64_t)AV_TIME_BASE * decoded_frame->nb_samples) / >> + avctx->sample_rate; > > ist->next_pts += ((int64_t)AV_TIME_BASE * decoded_frame->nb_samples) / > + avctx->sample_rate; > > Is duration less reliable?
The original packet duration can be less accurate if it's based on what's in the input stream. Or depending on what libavformat does, it can be a made-up value that's just plain wrong. -Justin _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
