On 09/12/11 14:11, Kostya Shishkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:50:51PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 09/12/11 13:36, Kostya Shishkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:14:59PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 09/12/11 11:07, Kostya Shishkov wrote:
+static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, void *data, int *data_size,
+                        AVPacket *avpkt)
+{
+    int h, w;
+    AVFrame *pic = avctx->coded_frame;
+    const uint8_t* src = avpkt->data;

uint8_t *src

Why can't I impose an additional constraints if I feel so?

just change the space and the * =p

Oh, right.

I wonder why it does shift spaces in reply? On patchworkk and  and in ML
archive it's correct.

brain damage in this email client to make stuff "fit", never
bothered to try to fix it. Yet.

Uhm what? If you mean that it should be *(AVFrame*)data = *pic; then you're
right but it's equivalent anyway.

Ok ^^;

Here's an update


Looks good.

lu

--

Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to