On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:49:28PM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 01:48:46PM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> >>>
> >>>--- a/tools/ismindex.c
> >>>+++ b/tools/ismindex.c
> >>>@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
> >>> #include <stdio.h>
> >>> #include <string.h>
> >>> #include <sys/stat.h>
> >>>+#ifdef _WIN32
> >>>+#include <io.h>
> >>>+#define mkdir(a, b) mkdir(a)
> >>>+#endif
> >>> #include "libavformat/avformat.h"
> >>> #include "libavutil/intreadwrite.h"
> >>> #include "libavutil/mathematics.h"
> >>
> >>libavformat/os_support.h would seem like a better place to hide this
> >>ugliness.
> >
> >os_support.h isn't an installed header, and I've tried to design
> >this tool to only use the public API (so it could be built as a
> >standalone external tool, too).
> 
> Is the patch ok with this reasoning, or do you still think it should
> be moved?

I would move it, but if you prefer to keep it here, fine.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to