On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:57:14 -0500, Justin Ruggles <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> ---
>  libavcodec/libfaac.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libavcodec/libfaac.c b/libavcodec/libfaac.c
> index 997aa83..7e65d9b 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/libfaac.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/libfaac.c
> @@ -31,16 +31,30 @@ typedef struct FaacAudioContext {
>      faacEncHandle faac_handle;
>  } FaacAudioContext;
>  
> +
> +static av_cold int Faac_encode_close(AVCodecContext *avctx)
> +{
> +    FaacAudioContext *s = avctx->priv_data;
> +
> +    av_freep(&avctx->coded_frame);
> +    av_freep(&avctx->extradata);
> +
> +    faacEncClose(s->faac_handle);
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static av_cold int Faac_encode_init(AVCodecContext *avctx)
>  {
>      FaacAudioContext *s = avctx->priv_data;
>      faacEncConfigurationPtr faac_cfg;
>      unsigned long samples_input, max_bytes_output;
> +    int ret;
>  
>      /* number of channels */
>      if (avctx->channels < 1 || avctx->channels > 6) {
>          av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "encoding %d channel(s) is not 
> allowed\n", avctx->channels);
> -        return -1;
> +        ret = AVERROR(EINVAL);
> +        goto error;

This will call faacEncClose on NULL if I'm reading it right. Is that
allowed?

>      }
>  
>      s->faac_handle = faacEncOpen(avctx->sample_rate,
> @@ -51,8 +65,8 @@ static av_cold int Faac_encode_init(AVCodecContext *avctx)
>      faac_cfg = faacEncGetCurrentConfiguration(s->faac_handle);
>      if (faac_cfg->version != FAAC_CFG_VERSION) {
>          av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "wrong libfaac version (compiled for: 
> %d, using %d)\n", FAAC_CFG_VERSION, faac_cfg->version);
> -        faacEncClose(s->faac_handle);
> -        return -1;
> +        ret = -1;
> +        goto error;

Wouldn't EINVAL be better here. I know, it's not exactly correct here,
but still better than permission denied.

-- 
Anton Khirnov
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to