On 2/24/12, Alex Converse <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2/24/12, Maans Rullgaard <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> On 2/24/12, Maans Rullgaard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2/24/12, Maans Rullgaard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/24/12, Maans Rullgaard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> libavcodec/png.c | 3 --- >>>>>>>>>> libavcodec/png.h | 6 +++--- >>>>>>>>>> libavcodec/pngdec.c | 4 ++-- >>>>>>>>>> libavcodec/pngenc.c | 2 +- >>>>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MNG-VLC demuxer/muxer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That is not an answer. >>>>>> >>>>>> How should than one get such value from libavformat? >>>>> >>>>> Please explain what problem this change is supposed to solve. >>>> >>>> See line above your question. >>> >>> That explains neither the problem nor the proposed solution. Try again. >> >> Problem: Code duplication. >> Solution: Move code to header so it can be used from libavformat. > > To clarify by VLC you mean "Very Low Complexity" and not "VLC media > player". Correct?
Yes, implementing anything highher than MNG-VLC imho needs adding new codec. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
