Hi, On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Derek Buitenhuis <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/03/2012 3:18 PM, Kostya Shishkov wrote: >> It's enough to verify it against any other decoder - luckynight was recoded >> into many lossless formats. That's how I could verify RALF decoding without >> having reference decoder output. > > $ avconv -i luckynight_2ch_44kHz_s16.wav -f s16le md5: 2>/dev/null > 97223f65c91213694a660d52f87f35aa > $ avconv -i luckynight-partial.wv -f s16le md5: 2>/dev/null > 97223f65c91213694a660d52f87f35aa > > And... > > On 22/03/2012 3:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/lossless-wma b/tests/ref/fate/lossless-wma >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..5bea19b >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/ref/fate/lossless-wma >> @@ -0,0 +1 @@ >> +35dc840f91cbcece02178d03c8f2fe26 > > This doesn't seem right then. Perhaps you used a uncut luckynight?
You're comparing partials, that's a little unfair. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
