On 16/04/2012 10:52 AM, Yusuke Nakamura wrote:
> The second patch may deny 
> http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=commit;f=libavformat/mov.c;h=26846ba5151b0fe90e21c1a6beb9a3bcb569d1ac
>  , while this commit denies splitted files with gradual decoder refresh (not 
> marked as a sync sample in 14496-15 spec).
> So, I prefer the second patch to this commit.

The first patch looks reasonable to me, but I'm unsure of
whether the second patch is a good idea or not -- key_off
will always end up being 1, even if sc->keyframes[0] and/or
sc->stps_data[0] are > 1. Seems like it could break things
or have unintended consequences. Perhaps someone more
familiar with mov.c could comment.

- Derek
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to