On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 01:03:22PM -0400, Sean McGovern wrote: > On Friday, May 4, 2012, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:32:24PM -0400, Sean McGovern wrote: > >> On 4/26/12, Sean McGovern <gsean...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > --- > >> > tests/rotozoom.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > >> > tests/videogen.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > >> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/tests/rotozoom.c b/tests/rotozoom.c > >> > index 9ce45cd..d9cfb42 100644 > >> > --- a/tests/rotozoom.c > >> > +++ b/tests/rotozoom.c > >> > >> Ping. > > > > The patch is good, I could queue it tomorrow. It does, however, conflict > > with the code duplication refactoring patch I just sent for these > programs. > > > > Applying your patch on top of mine would be somewhat more elegant and > > simple. > > I have no problem with depending on your patch. Do you need me to rebase or > can you do that?
I'll push my patch in a moment and then try to rebase yours on top of mine in the next days. If you want to beat me to it, feel free... Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
