On 18/06/2012 2:57 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On 18/06/2012 2:41 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote: >>>> What does that do? >>> >>> Static msvcrt linkage (no reliance on msvcrXX.dll). >> >> And how does that relate to the patch at hand? Does it magically >> provide one of the already supported memalign() variants?
Sorry, it is indeed unrelated. Ignore the /MT bit then. My apologies. I need to push some coffee onto my brain. > If one were to be using MSVC, one wouldn't have to compromise with the > baseline runtime to target, since the runtime is built in. > > However, that's not related to the patch at all. And for mingw, one can't > statically link the runtime. Ditto. > For mingw however, there apparently is a __mingw_aligned_malloc which does > about the same, and is included in the small mingw runtime which indeed is > statically linked. So we can add a separate function check for that one > (patch coming up soon) and use it if found - then the target msvcrt > version wouldn't matter at all for this. Yeah, this has been discussed on IRC... i was just going to shoot at email about it off ;). - Derek _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
