On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:57:07AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:43:13AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote : > > On 07/17/2012 08:13 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > --- > > > Somehow I missed this during review - of course the prudent choice is > > > not to assume compatibility until it has been confirmed. In general > > > compatibility between copyleft-style licenses is tricky... > > > > We discussed that before the commit, the short version of fdk license > > and the verbose (l)gpl version match the restriction. > > > > Or so it seemed to us when we committed the patch. Not sure what changed > > in that interpretation. > > Did any of us ask FLSC, FSFE or Chris?
Derek mailed the SFLC and got a negative response. Until we get further clarification I believe we have to assume incompatibility. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
