On 22/07/2012 6:58 PM, Kieran Kunhya wrote: >> _mmx seems to usually signify inline asm, no? Shouldn't we still use some >> > sort of suffix to indicate this? Perhaps I am mistaken. > It signifies inline asm only by nature of the fact that the mmx at the > time was written using inline asm.
Perhaps it is time to make a design choice for names? - Derek _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
