Hi, On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Alex Converse <alex.conve...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> From: "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> >> >> This fixes "make fate-eval" on MSVC builds. Without this, the test outputs >> "-1.#NaN" instead of "nan" on MSVS 2010. >> --- >> libavutil/eval.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/libavutil/eval.c b/libavutil/eval.c >> index ef37ad8..6131263 100644 >> --- a/libavutil/eval.c >> +++ b/libavutil/eval.c >> @@ -671,6 +671,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) >> av_expr_parse_and_eval(&d, *expr, >> const_names, const_values, >> NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL); >> +#ifdef _MSC_VER >> + if (isnan(d)) >> + printf("'%s' -> nan\n\n", *expr); >> + else >> +#endif >> printf("'%s' -> %f\n\n", *expr, d); >> } >> > > Funny, when I proposed this without the MSC ifdef, you were wholly against it. > > And once again I will state that a conformant libc has the freedom to > print "[-]nan(n-char-sequence)". So why not just drop the ifdef?
I'll drop the ifdef. Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel