On 07/26/2012 11:40 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:28:29PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 07/22/2012 12:17 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> --- >>> LICENSE | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> So far ok but >> >>> +The Fraunhofer AAC library, FAAC and OpenSSL are under licenses >>> incompatible >>> +with all (L)GPL versions. Thus, unfortunately, since both licenses cannot >>> be >>> +satisfied simultaneously, binaries resulting from the combination of Libav >>> +with these libraries are nonfree und unredistributable. If you wish to >>> enable >>> +any of these libraries nonetheless, pass --enable-nonfree to configure. >> >> OpenSSL, being a system library is NOT to be marked nonfree in a quite >> number of platforms... > > Oh, that opens a big can of worms... > > What platforms do you have in mind? Also, we currently do mark it as > incompatible in configure by requiring the nonfree flag. So I'm just > describing the status quo.
Let it as is, bsd people could survive till we fix that part. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
