On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:38:29PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: > "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Other than that, > >> this feels like it belongs in compat/ rather than libavutil. Not really > >> sure how best to build it though. > > > > I was actually thinking of that for the header, yes. I suppose we can > > do it for the source also, but then again, we'd need to link lavu with > > that, which seems kind of complex for the rather simple thing we're > > trying to accomplish here? > > I'm trying to not contaminate libavutil with things that don't belong > there. That is worth a little complexity.
While we're discussing the subject (sorry if I hijack the thread), this applies to all those math functions that we fall back on for obsolete systems that lack them. Having a better place than libavutil for them sounds like a good idea. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
