On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:06:08AM -0400, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 15/08/2012 1:21 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > >> Why not something a bit more windows-specific like _doserrno? > > > > Yeah, sounds like a good idea. > > > >>> and snprintf as a check for mingw? > >> > >> Don't we already have mingw awareness? > > > > Derek, do you think that will work? I think this sounds like a good > > approach. > > After some discussion on IRC, it seems like we will wait > until non-MinGW Windows (MSVC) has its own target-os in > configure. > > Perhaps we push strtod() and and pals, leaving them unused > until configure support gets added?
I'm against more replacement functions getting added to libav. We already have too many of them and they should all get killed. This stuff belongs in an independent compatibility lib. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
