On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:50:00AM +0000, Babic, Nedeljko wrote: > Basically, it is not so important to us which license will be in headers. > We can use license suggested by Diego, or we can use the same license that is > used > in rest of Libav files and just add developers that worked on those files, or > we can > use something else. > > You can suggest what form of license do you want in files and I will make > changes > and resubmit patches.
Then please just use plain, unadorned LGPL. The file doc/mips.txt is thus pointless, just drop it. Diego P.S.: Your Exchange/Outlook is messing up quoting in evil ways. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
