On 10/04/2012 07:38 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On 04/10/2012 12:43 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>>> This gets rid of the variable-length scratch buffer by filtering 16
>>> pixels at a time and writing directly to the destination.  The extra
>>> loads this requires to load the source values are compensated by not
>>> doing a round-trip to memory before shifting.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <m...@mansr.com>
>>> ---
>>>  libswscale/ppc/swscale_altivec.c | 154 
>>> +++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>>
>> From my (very) limited knowledge of AltiVec, I -think- this looks OK.
>>
>> I assume you've run this through FATE on PPC.
> 
> I was a bit too eager and sent it while fate was still running.
> Obviously a test that hadn't run yet had to fail...

Where?
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to