Hi, On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:48:20AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 10/05/2012 01:29 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> > Oh right you mean for performance? >> > fate-h264-conformance-cama2_vtc_b >> > fate-h264-conformance-cama3_vtc_b >> > should be ok. >> >> I'd push your patch + my style nits soon, I'll build tsan2 soon (yai >> gentoo live ebuilds) since I'm curious about what's wrong with slice >> threading I guess most of the issues could be uncovered clearly there. > > Here's an issue to fix wrt sliced threading: > > http://fate.libav.org/x86_64-linux-slice-threading/20121005005502
One of the mailinglists recently had an email about our slice threading impl relying on wakeups-only-by-signal, i.e. spurious wakeups could lead to races, can you look at that and see if it fixes it? Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
