On 10/09/2012 09:47 PM, Janne Grunau wrote: >>> - memset(c->nodep_buf[i], 0, 2 * frontier * sizeof(*c->nodep_buf)); >>> + memset(c->nodep_buf[i], 0, 2 * frontier * >>> sizeof(*c->nodep_buf[i])); >>> nodes[i][0] = c->node_buf[i] + frontier; >>> nodes[i][0]->ssd = 0; >>> nodes[i][0]->path = 0; >>> >> >> Using the **foo wouldn't be equivalent? > > **c->nodep_buf would be equivalent but *c->nodep_buf[i] matches the > pointer argument.
not sure which you'd consider misleading. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
