On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 01:34:00AM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 12:13 AM, Kostya Shishkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 05:43:18PM -0400, Justin Ruggles wrote:
> >> ---
> >>  libavcodec/dca_parser.c |    3 +--
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/libavcodec/dca_parser.c b/libavcodec/dca_parser.c
> >> index 7e65d0b..ab235cf 100644
> >> --- a/libavcodec/dca_parser.c
> >> +++ b/libavcodec/dca_parser.c
> >> @@ -192,8 +192,7 @@ static int dca_parse(AVCodecParserContext * s,
> >>      /* read the duration and sample rate from the frame header */
> >>      if (!dca_parse_params(buf, buf_size, &duration, &sample_rate)) {
> >>          s->duration = duration;
> >> -        if (!avctx->sample_rate)
> >> -            avctx->sample_rate = sample_rate;
> >> +        avctx->sample_rate = sample_rate;
> >>      } else
> >>          s->duration = 0;
> >>  
> >> -- 
> > 
> > LGTM (I wonder what happens when we support extensions like X96k properly 
> > but
> > that's outside the scope of this patch)
> 
> I guess if the sample rate available at the parser level does not
> accurately reflect the real sample rate then we just don't set it there
> at all...

I guess it's better to set it and for decoder to change it if needed.
But it's all bikeshed, let's wait till we get full-featured DTS decoder.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to