Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: >> Why? If you don't want LZO support, why shouldn't you be allowed to disable >> it, API or not? > > Public API/ABI should always be the same for a given version of the > library, and not depend on build options, or you run into a whole load > of headaches with dynamic linking.
*Many* libraries let you customise the API. In those cases, it is the responsibility of the system builder to configure things properly. As long as it's enabled by default, I don't see a problem. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
