On 11/05/2012 01:23 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:51:04PM -0500, Justin Ruggles wrote: >> --- a/tests/fate/flac.mak >> +++ b/tests/fate/flac.mak >> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ FATE_FLAC += fate-flac-16-chmode-indep >> \ >> fate-flac-16-fixed \ >> fate-flac-16-lpc-cholesky \ >> fate-flac-16-lpc-levinson \ >> + fate-flac-24-comp-8 \ >> >> @@ -13,6 +14,11 @@ fate-flac-16-lpc-%: OPTS = -lpc_type >> $(@:fate-flac-16-lpc-%=%) >> >> +fate-flac-24-comp-%: OPTS = -compression_level $(@:fate-flac-24-comp-%=%) >> + >> +fate-flac-24-%: REF = >> $(SAMPLES)/audio-reference/divertimenti_2ch_96kHz_s24.wav >> +fate-flac-24-%: CMD = enc_dec_pcm flac wav s24le $(REF) -c flac $(OPTS) > > Why the two different patterns? You only added comp-8 tests for now? > Will other types of tests follow later that will match different OPTS > values through a different pattern?
Just making it easier to do so for compression level. Ideally we will want to check various compression levels for regressions. -Justin _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
