On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 04:25:19PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 06:47:52PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 08:45:48AM -0700, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > > > --- > > > > The test program is of doubtful utility, fails to compile on x86_32 and > > > > was never part of our test suite. > > > > libavcodec/Makefile | 3 +- > > > > libavcodec/cabac.c | 147 > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > > > 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-) > > > > > > This is probably the 20th time you're submitting this patch. Can you > > > please not do that? Are you just hoping someone isn't paying attention > > > and accidently says yes? > > > > It's been 10 months and nobody fixed it, converted it into a FATE test > > or even touched it. Now it does not even compile anymore. I sent a > > mail mentioning that and I asked around on IRC what to do with > > cabac-test, reactions ranged from "don't care" to "remove". > > > > > Why don't you fix the bug that prevents it from working. > > > > Because I don't believe it's worth the trouble. The fact that these > > test programs are in a continuous state of disrepair and only I notice > > when they break after months or years suggests that nobody uses them > > or cares. > > > > But if you disagree with that asessment, why don't you fix it? You know > > our H.264 code, I don't. I'm already working on all the surrounding glue > > that will keep the test programs working into the future. > > .. ping .. > > It would be nice to have one less failing test program for the release.
Ronald dropped his opposition on IRC. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
