On 11/16/2012 10:14 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:56:05PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote: >> On 11/14/2012 02:38 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> Now the difference between "all" and "everything" seems arbitrary. >>> Why don't we just set clear semantics on what we call "parts" and >>> "components" or "components" and "subcomponents"? >> >> From an usability point of view you are not going to change that option, >> the best is to clarify it making so from reading --help you would not >> expect it to disable something it does not. > > The usability is what I am trying to fix here, among other things. Having > both --disable-everything and --disable-all as options is a usability > nightmare. I'd have to look up which option did what myself in a few > weeks time after implementing them...
As I said, sadly, we can do anything but change the name or the effect of --disable-everything =\ lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
