Hi, On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 13/01/13 01:57, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: >> These will surely be controversial. Specifically, the 2nd patch. >> Better ideas welcome (shove it in the converter is not a better >> idea in this particular case). > > The patch about having %zu or %Iu is a *bit* convoluted indeed. > Hopefully someone will have a better idea (casting to 64bit and using > PRIu64 is as ugly). > > The rest about libm.h might suggest we bite the bullet and generate a > minimal host_config.h (as in I do not consider such replacements a good > idea).
I don't mind the first 4 patches. Maybe add a comment why we don't use cbrt/lrint/llrint in each place, for obviousness purposes? Ronald _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
