On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 03:52:06PM -0800, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Diego Biurrun <di...@biurrun.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 12:32:30AM +0000, Mans Rullgard wrote: > >> --- > >> libavcodec/Makefile | 1 + > >> libavcodec/dsputil.c | 27 -- > >> libavcodec/dsputil.h | 3 - > >> libavcodec/dsputil_template.c | 596 > >> +---------------------------------------- > >> libavcodec/h264.c | 6 +- > >> libavcodec/h264.h | 2 + > >> libavcodec/h264qpel.c | 86 ++++++ > >> libavcodec/h264qpel.h | 38 +++ > >> libavcodec/h264qpel_template.c | 550 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> libavcodec/hpel_template.h | 100 +++++++ > >> libavcodec/rv30dsp.c | 12 +- > >> libavcodec/rv40dsp.c | 28 +- > >> libavcodec/x86/Makefile | 1 + > >> libavcodec/x86/dsputil_mmx.c | 93 +------ > >> libavcodec/x86/h264_qpel.c | 126 +++++++++ > >> 15 files changed, 938 insertions(+), 731 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 libavcodec/h264qpel.c > >> create mode 100644 libavcodec/h264qpel.h > >> create mode 100644 libavcodec/h264qpel_template.c > >> create mode 100644 libavcodec/hpel_template.h > > > > This is missing the configure bits, but looks good otherwise on a > > quick glance - any more opinions? > > Splitting dsputil into individual pieces can only be good.
Have you had a closer look? We should get this in sooner rather than later before conflicts start accumulating. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
