On 07/02/13 14:09, Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
> So far we took only the codec sample aspect ratio into account
> and ignored the one from the stream when using libavfilter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Pantelic <vlado...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  avplay.c |    6 ++++++
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/avplay.c b/avplay.c
> index 3e2110f..58b16d5 100644
> --- a/avplay.c
> +++ b/avplay.c
> @@ -1636,6 +1636,12 @@ static int video_thread(void *arg)
>          }
>  
>          frame->pts = pts_int;
> +        if (!frame->sample_aspect_ratio.num) {
> +            /* no aspect ratio in frame, check if the stream has one*/
> +            if (is->video_st->sample_aspect_ratio.num) {
> +                frame->sample_aspect_ratio = 
> is->video_st->sample_aspect_ratio;
> +            }
> +        }
>          if (is->use_dr1) {
>              FrameBuffer      *buf = frame->opaque;
>              AVFilterBufferRef *fb = 
> avfilter_get_video_buffer_ref_from_arrays(
> 

I wonder if we shouldn't always provide the information per-frame.

The patch doesn't seem wrong if we agree to keep the situation as is.

lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to