On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:23:33AM -0500, Sean McGovern wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is more compatible and not more complicated. > > --- > > > > This tidbit might also fix a Solaris FATE station as a sideeffect. > > This... would surprise me. It's not "wrong" to separate the arguments, > but I am reasonably certain that ln(1) doesn't require it on Solaris > 10 or 11.
The error messages on the following FATE box point in the direction of argument order: http://fate.libav.org/sparc-solaris-gcc/20130223213902 The patch is a reasonable simplification nonetheless, so it makes sense to push it in any case. We'll see what happens. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
