On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:49:26 +0100, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 09:22:26AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > --- a/tests/fate/filter.mak > > +++ b/tests/fate/filter.mak > > @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ fate-filter-delogo: CMD = framecrc -i > > $(SAMPLES)/real/rv30.rm -vf delogo=show=0: > > > > +FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-$(CONFIG_GRADFUN_FILTER) += fate-filter-gradfun > > +fate-filter-gradfun: CMD = framecrc -c:v pgmyuv -i $(SRC) -vf gradfun > > + > > > > @@ -42,5 +45,10 @@ fate-filter-yadif-mode1: CMD = framecrc -flags bitexact > > -idct simple -i $(SAMPLE > > > > +$(FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-yes): tests/vsynth1/00.pgm > > +$(FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-yes): SRC = $(TARGET_PATH)/tests/vsynth1/%02d.pgm > > +FATE_FILTER_IMAGE-$(call DEMDEC, IMAGE2, PGMYUV) += > > $(FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-yes) > > + > > +FATE_AVCONV += $(FATE_FILTER_IMAGE-yes) > > FATE_SAMPLES_AVCONV += $(FATE_FILTER-yes) > > -fate-filter: $(FATE_FILTER-yes) > > +fate-filter: $(FATE_FILTER-yes) $(FATE_FILTER_IMAGE-yes) > > Do we plan to add more of these filters? Otherwise I do not see the > point in all this indirection. >
Most certainly, see the other lavfi patcheset. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
