On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:46:50PM +0200, Vittorio Giovara wrote: >> --- a/tests/fate/filter-video.mak >> +++ b/tests/fate/filter-video.mak >> @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ fate-filter-drawbox: CMD = framecrc -c:v pgmyuv -i $(SRC) >> -vf drawbox=10:20:200: >> FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-$(CONFIG_FADE_FILTER) += fate-filter-fade >> fate-filter-fade: CMD = framecrc -c:v pgmyuv -i $(SRC) -vf >> fade=in:0:25,fade=out:25:25 >> >> +#this filter has to be tested against an interlaced video >> +FATE_FILTER_VSYNTH-$(CONFIG_FIELDORDER_FILTER) += fate-filter-fieldorder >> +fate-filter-fieldorder: CMD = framecrc -c:v dvvideo -i >> $(TARGET_PATH)/tests/data/fate/vsynth1-dv-50.dv -vf fieldorder=tff > > This does not really fit in the VSYNTH group, it does not use SRC and I > don't think it depends on VREF. > > It does depend on vsynth1-dv-50.dv and the DV video encoder though.
True, but actually I do not need dv encoder (or decoder) for this test, I'd just need an interlaced file (or the filter will just silently exit). What would be better to do it? I could either make the test dependent on the interlace filter, or create an interlaced vsynth video or use something else entirely? Vittorio _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
