On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:45:15 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > From: Rudolf Polzer <[email protected]> > > Before, it just returned width/height. Correct is width/height*sar. > > That way it is consistent with DAR as in probe output and setdar. > > Signed-off-by: Rudolf Polzer <[email protected]> > --- > doc/filters.texi | 7 +++++-- > libavfilter/vf_scale.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/filters.texi b/doc/filters.texi > index afb48b1..85c78b1 100644 > --- a/doc/filters.texi > +++ b/doc/filters.texi > @@ -1856,12 +1856,15 @@ the output (cropped) width and height > @item ow, oh > same as @var{out_w} and @var{out_h} > > -@item dar, a > -input display aspect ratio, same as @var{iw} / @var{ih} > +@item a > +same as @var{iw} / @var{ih} > > @item sar > input sample aspect ratio > > +@item dar > +input display aspect ratio, it is the same as (@var{iw} / @var{ih}) * > @var{sar} > +
Given that the previous behavior was documented (even if inconsistent and evil), I'd say it warrants a micro version bump and perhaps even a changelog entry. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
