On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:57:50PM -0800, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 09:59:52PM -0800, Martynas Venckus wrote: > > > compat/bsd/limits.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > configure | 2 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 compat/bsd/limits.h > > > > Whoa, instead of patching things around, can we do this right and fix it > > upstream? It's not like the upstream is uncooperative. > > Wait, what? > > You mean that after years of fending of BSD "porters" that ran around > and patched every single application that used some unavailable standard > feature instead of patching their libc/whatever once, you turn the tables > on us and display righteous anger when we think about adding a local hack > for a BSD instead of fixing things at the source? > > I am positively delighted. Hats off, dude!
Note: There was no sarcasm involved here. I am absolutely, positively delighted that you step forward and proactively try to fix the issue at the root. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
