From: Zhang Rui <[email protected]> In RFC 2616, this was explicitly said to be an absolute url, while it in an upcoming draft [1] is allowed to be relative as well.
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-25#section-7.1.2 --- libavformat/http.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libavformat/http.c b/libavformat/http.c index a26ec2a..eb08dfe 100644 --- a/libavformat/http.c +++ b/libavformat/http.c @@ -335,7 +335,10 @@ static int process_line(URLContext *h, char *line, int line_count, while (av_isspace(*p)) p++; if (!av_strcasecmp(tag, "Location")) { - av_strlcpy(s->location, p, sizeof(s->location)); + char redirected_location[MAX_URL_SIZE]; + ff_make_absolute_url(redirected_location, sizeof(redirected_location), + s->location, p); + av_strlcpy(s->location, redirected_location, sizeof(s->location)); *new_location = 1; } else if (!av_strcasecmp (tag, "Content-Length") && s->filesize == -1) { s->filesize = strtoll(p, NULL, 10); -- 1.7.9.4 _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
