On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:39:41PM +0200, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >--- a/configure
> >+++ b/configure
> >@@ -1576,7 +1576,6 @@ fast_64bit_if_any="alpha ia64 mips64 parisc64 ppc64
> >sparc64 x86_64"
> >fast_clz_if_any="alpha avr32 mips ppc x86"
> >
> >-inline_asm_deps="!tms470"
> >need_memalign="altivec neon sse"
> >
> >@@ -4144,6 +4143,7 @@ elif enabled armcc; then
> > add_cflags -W${armcc_opt},--diag_suppress=513 # pointer sign
> >elif enabled tms470; then
> > add_cflags -pds=824 -pds=837
> >+ disable inline_asm
> >elif enabled pathscale; then
> > add_cflags -fstrict-overflow -OPT:wrap_around_unsafe_opt=OFF
> >elif enabled_any msvc icl; then
>
> Probably ok, but why?
It's a more appropriate place. I could also squash the two patches and
call it all
configure: Move toolchain dependency declarations to a more appropriate place
Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
