When working with other specifications, I have tried to use variable names matching names used in the specification. But with dca, that would get a bit too ugly (the spec is written as some kind of pseudocode, with hungarian naming, camelCase, "m_"-prefixes on some names, etc).
So I try to come up with names that make sense to me. But then it's not always obvious how variables in the implementation corresonds to the spec/pseudocode. Any sugggestion on convention? I think it would make somse sense to add a comment to each variable (local or in the state structs) spelling out the corresponding name used in the spec. That would make it easier to map variables in the code to the processing as described in the spec. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
