On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:59:08PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 24/03/14 11:28 AM, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:37:56PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > >> --- a/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm > >> +++ b/libavcodec/x86/dcadsp.asm > >> @@ -230,6 +230,14 @@ DCA_LFE_FIR 1 > >> mova m12, [ptr1 + j + mmsize] > >> %endif > >> +%if cpuflag(fma3) > >> + fmaddps m2, m6, [win + %1 + j + 16 * 4], m2 > >> + fnmaddps m1, m5, [win + %1 + j], m1 > >> +%if ARCH_X86_64 > >> + fmaddps m8, m12, [win + %1 + j + mmsize + 16 * 4], m8 > >> + fnmaddps m7, m11, [win + %1 + j + mmsize], m7 > >> +%endif > >> +%else ; non-FMA > > > > Doesn't FMA3 imply x86_64? > > No, no simd extension so far implies x86_64. Not even the upcoming AVX512.
But which modern x86 SIMD extensions are available on x86_32? Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
