On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 05:27:46PM +0200, Tim Walker wrote: > On 21 Sep 2014, at 18:16, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Tim Walker <tdskywal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> --- a/tests/fate/microsoft.mak > >> +++ b/tests/fate/microsoft.mak > >> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ fate-vc1_sa10143: CMD = framecrc -i > >> $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/vc1/SA10143.vc1 > >> FATE_VC1-$(CONFIG_VC1_DEMUXER) += fate-vc1_sa20021 > >> fate-vc1_sa20021: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/vc1/SA20021.vc1 > >> > >> +FATE_VC1-$(CONFIG_VC1_DEMUXER) += fate-vc1_ilaced_twomv > >> +fate-vc1_ilaced_twomv: CMD = framecrc -i > >> $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/vc1/ilaced_twomv.vc1 > >> + > >> FATE_VC1-$(CONFIG_MOV_DEMUXER) += fate-vc1-ism > >> fate-vc1-ism: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/isom/vc1-wmapro.ism -an > > > > Just to clarify, one of the existing conformity tests (sa10143 > > specifically) is interlaced, your commit makes it sound like this is the > > first. > > I don't mind renaming it, but to what? Patch was already added to > FATE, FWIW. Can we come to an agreement so I can send an updated > patchset?
I think just changing the log message to fate: Add VC-1 interlaced twomv test should be enough. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
