On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 4:42:03 PM Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 08/01/15 00:27, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> > Hadn't thought of that, yes twolame should definitely get priority
> >
>
> Twolame fdk-aac and x264 should go in a group with higher priority, then
> native, then external lower priority.
>

I completely agree. On that note it would be better if faac has higher
priority than aac as, in any case, it is still better than the native one.

Of course this should be in a different patch.

Timothy
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to