On 26.05.2015 15:58, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 26/05/15 15:24, Vittorio Giovara wrote: >>> >>> From: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> >>> --- >>> libavformat/mov.c | 4 +++- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/libavformat/mov.c b/libavformat/mov.c >>> index a965328..99f57ec 100644 >>> --- a/libavformat/mov.c >>> +++ b/libavformat/mov.c >>> @@ -1942,10 +1942,11 @@ static int mov_read_stsz(MOVContext *c, >>> AVIOContext *pb, MOVAtom atom) >>> >>> sc->sample_count = i; >>> >>> + av_free(buf); >>> + >>> if (pb->eof_reached) >>> return AVERROR_EOF; >>> >>> - av_free(buf); >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> @@ -2038,6 +2039,7 @@ static int mov_read_ctts(MOVContext *c, AVIOContext >>> *pb, MOVAtom atom) >>> return 0; >>> if (entries >= UINT_MAX / sizeof(*sc->ctts_data)) >>> return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; >>> + av_freep(&sc->ctts_data); >> >> >> shouldn't go above ? >> >> The idea is to reset the ctts at the start so that if you fail to get the >> new one you aren't using the previous I think. > > Probably. Andreas, what do you say?
I'm not sure what's worse: Having the old one or having none. I'm fine with either way. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
