On 08/11/15 21:08, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > Anyway this thread is not the right place for discussion, and > notwithstanding the above, I'd say 4 codecs over 350+ (or 117+ if you > consider encoders only) is a very small number.
As the current status, that patch seems fine. We can discuss a bit about those options and maybe find a way to reduce the duplication when they are really all the same later. _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
