On 21.01.2016 23:21, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 21/01/16 23:03, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> Why not fix the issue properly instead of removing useful functionality? > > It is not exactly useful (since it is quite unwieldy)
But I'm sure it's used in quite some scripts. > and the initial > infrastructure to policy path and protocols is already in the ml. I don't see how that would fix this problem. > So the two are sort of orthogonal. Then why do you bring this up here? > Concat can be misused doesn't matter what by it's nature as courmish > pointed out on IRC. I don't think that's true. How did he come to that conclusion? Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list libav-devel@libav.org https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
