On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Vittorio Giovara
<vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
> <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 15.12.2015 08:17, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>> Can you share the sample that shows the problem?
>>
>> I could, but it's of no use for comparing with libopus, because their
>> decoder errors out in an unrelated check.
>>
>>> From what I can see, libopus does not do any clipping at that point, so
>>> something else must ensure that there is no overflow.
>>
>> Indeed, the real problem is just a silly typo...
>> It might have been caused by the fact that the specification uses
>> i and k in exactly the opposite way than the code.
>>
>> New patch attached.
>
> This patch might have been forgotten, ping reviewers.
> --
> Vittorio

never mind, found it (17776638c392d104975aba169e17b186490e1d5e)
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to