On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 24/03/16 11:58, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> Noticed one more bit that can be pulled out from various codecs.
>> mathtables.c may not be the best place in the world for it, but
>> ff_zigzag_direct lives there already.
>
> If/once it grows bigger that what's plausible it can be split, for now
> it seems fine.

I would be leaning towards moving both functions in a separate file
(zigzagdata.c?) and adjust dependencies accordingly, in order to
reduce the number of code moves (also mathops does seem the wrong
place for these tables).
-- 
Vittorio
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
libav-devel@libav.org
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to